SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Multi-Fused S,N-Heterocyclic Compounds for Targeting α-Synuclein Aggregates.

Cells · 2025-09-30

DOI: 10.3390/cells14191531PMID: 41090759

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The development of positron emission tomography (PET) tracers targeting α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates is critical for the early diagnosis, differential classification, and therapeutic monitoring of synucleinopathies such as Parkinson's disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple system atrophy. Despite recent advances, challenges including the low abundance of α-syn aggregates (10-50× lower than amyloid-beta (Aβ) or Tau), structural heterogeneity (e.g., flat fibrils in PD vs. cylindrical forms in DLB), co-pathology with Aβ/Tau, and poor metabolic stability have hindered PET tracer development for this target. To optimize our previously reported pyridothiophene-based radiotracer, [18F]asyn-44, we present the synthesis and evaluation of novel S,N-heterocyclic scaffold derivatives for α-syn. A library of 49 compounds was synthesized, with 8 potent derivatives (LMD-006, LMD-022, LMD-029, LMD-044, LMD-045, LMD-046, LMD-051, and LMD-052) demonstrating equilibrium inhibition constants (Ki) of 6-16 nM in PD brain homogenates, all of which are amenable for radiolabeling with fluorine-18. This work advances the molecular toolkit for synucleinopathies and provides a roadmap for overcoming barriers in PET tracer development, with lead compounds that can be considered for biomarker-guided clinical trials and targeted therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.