SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Decoding Glycosylation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Opportunities.

FASEB J · 2025-10-01

DOI: 10.1096/fj.202502809rPMID: 41110100

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Glycosylation is a highly dynamic and complex post-translational modification that plays a pivotal role in regulating protein folding, trafficking, stability, and function. Accumulating evidence indicates that aberrant glycosylation is intimately involved in the pathogenesis of multiple neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular mechanisms by which the two predominant forms of glycosylation, N-glycosylation and O-GlcNAcylation, contribute to protein misfolding, synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and impaired stress responses in the diseased nervous system. We further explore the diagnostic potential of glycosylation biomarkers and emerging therapeutic strategies targeting glycosylation pathways. Special emphasis has been placed on recent advances in glycomic technologies, artificial intelligence-driven analytics, and nanocarrier-based drug delivery platforms. By integrating mechanistic insights with translational applications, this review highlights glycosylation as both a pathological driver and a promising therapeutic target in neurodegenerative disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.