SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Exosome-based modulation of ferroptosis in neurological disorders: mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and translational challenges.

Front Immunol · 2025-10-20

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1677808PMID: 41190075

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurological disorders, including acute insults such as stroke and traumatic brain injury and chronic neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease, exert a profound global health burden. Ferroptosis, a distinct form of regulated cell death driven by iron accumulation, lipid peroxidation, and oxidative stress, has emerged as a central pathological mechanism across these conditions. Exosomes, nanoscale extracellular vesicles capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and delivering functional cargos such as microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and proteins, have demonstrated remarkable potential in modulating ferroptotic signaling. Through regulation of the GPX4-GSH axis, ferritinophagy, iron homeostasis, and antioxidant pathways, exosome-based interventions offer neuroprotective benefits in diverse models of neurological injury. This review synthesizes current advances in the mechanistic understanding of ferroptosis and highlights emerging strategies leveraging exosomes as precision delivery platforms for ferroptosis-targeted therapy. We also discuss the translational challenges and future directions necessary to realize exosome-guided neuroprotection as a viable clinical paradigm.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.