SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: systematic review protocol.

BJPsych Open · 2025-11-07

DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2025.10896PMID: 41198569

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundCognitive impairment is a significant, yet often overlooked, non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease, and a strong predictor of quality of life for those affected. Despite the availability of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for Parkinson's disease, their efficacy for the cognitive symptoms of the disease specifically is unclear, as no 'gold standard' treatment strategy for cognitive impairment in the disease has yet emerged. Further, a comparative understanding of the efficacy of each of these treatment options is severely lacking.AimsThis systematic review aims to critically evaluate the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.MethodA comprehensive systematic search will be conducted to identify studies involving participants clinically diagnosed with Parkinson's disease that assess non-pharmacological interventions targeting cognitive impairment. If feasible, results will be synthesised using meta-analysis; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be used.ResultsThis is a protocol for a systematic review that is yet to be conducted.ConclusionsThe findings from this review will provide critical insight into the efficacy of non-pharmacological treatment options for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease, which may help to influence clinical recommendations for the treatment of cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease and highlight existing gaps in the literature.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.