SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effects of glucocerebrosidase gene variations on the risk of Parkinson's disease dementia: a meta-analysis.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-11-14

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1671760PMID: 41323658

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) variations on the risk of Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) and to identify the relationship between GBA variations and PDD.MethodA comprehensive search was performed to retrieve publications from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science up to March 19, 2025. The search terms included "glucocerebrosidase," "Parkinson's disease," and "dementia." After rigorous screening, cohort studies were included for meta-analysis.ResultsThis meta-analysis revealed a significant overall association between the presence of GBA variation and an increased risk of dementia in PD patients (RR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.52-2.18, p p p = 0.001). Analysis of specific mutations revealed that the N370S variant was associated with an increase in dementia risk (RR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.24-1.92, p p p ConclusionGBA variations are significant risk factors for PDD, with varying degrees of risk conferred by different variants. These findings underscore the critical role of GBA in the pathogenesis of PDD and highlight its potential as a key genetic risk factor.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?, Identifier CRD420251109378.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.