SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Beyond Dysphagia in Parkinson's Disease: 3D Printing of Orally Disintegrating Tablets (ODTs) for Optimized Treatment.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel) · 2025-12-13

DOI: 10.3390/ph18121886PMID: 41471375

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is frequently complicated by dysphagia, undermining timely and reliable oral dopaminergic medication. Levodopa's short half-life and delayed gastric emptying in advanced PD result in inconsistent absorption, delayed "ON" periods, and challenges to adherence. Orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs) dissolve without water and can mitigate swallowing limitations. Research indicates that selegiline ODT achieves a faster time to peak and higher relative bioavailability via partial buccal absorption, whereas carbidopa/levodopa ODTs are bioequivalent to immediate release tablets (with similar AUC/Cmax and approximately 1 h Tmax) without consistent motor advantages but with higher patient acceptability. This review synthesizes the clinical burden of dysphagia in PD, pharmacokinetic constraints of current formulations, and the reasons for ODTs. We highlight 3D printing as a route to personalized, dysphagia friendly therapy, which enables dose individualization, polypills, engineered disintegration or release, and point-of-care production. Feasibility studies underscore stability considerations such as carbidopa, throughput and regulatory requirements (QbD/GMP), and bioequivalence information. We outline priorities to integrate 3D printed ODTs into PD care, aligning formulation, pharmacokinetics, and human factors to improve adherence and clinical outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.