NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundPathogenic LRRK2 gene variants are a major genetic risk factor for both familial and sporadic Parkinson's dissease (PD), opening an unattended window into disease mechanisms and potential therapies. Investigating the influence of pathogenic variants in LRRK2 gene on brain structure is a crucial step toward enabling early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Yet, despite its significance, the ways in which LRRK2 genotype affects brain structure remain largely unexplored. Work in this domain is plagued by small sample sizes and differences in cohort composition, which can obscure genuine distinctions among clinical subgroups.MethodsIn this study, we overcome such important limitations by combining explicit modeling of population background variation and pattern matching. Specifically, we leverage a cohort of 603 participants (including 370 with a PD diagnosis) to examine MRI-detectable cortical atrophy patterns associated with the LRRK2 pathogenic variants in people with PD and carriers without Parkinson's symptoms.ResultsLRRK2 PD patients exhibit milder cortical thinning compared to sporadic PD, with notable preservation in temporal and occipital regions, suggesting a distinct pattern of neurodegeneration. Non-manifesting LRRK2 carriers show no significant cortical atrophy, indicating no structural signs of subclinical PD. We further analyze the relationship between aggregated alpha-synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid and atrophy. We find that those with evidence of aggregated alpha-synuclein experienced pronounced neurodegeneration and increased cortical thinning, possibly defining another aggressive PD subtype.ConclusionsOur findings highlight genetic avenues for distinguishing PD subtypes, which could lead to more targeted treatment approaches and a more complete understanding of Parkinson's disease progression.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.