SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Drug-Induced Parkinsonism: A Structured, Mechanism-Informed Approach to Identification and Management.

Cureus · 2025-12-02

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.98340PMID: 41487741

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP) is an underrecognized form of secondary parkinsonism that can mimic idiopathic Parkinson's disease yet is largely reversible. While the use of first-generation antipsychotics has declined, additional agents, including valproate, cyclosporine, vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors, and Rauwolfia serpentina-based herbal supplements, have emerged as notable contributors. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiologic, mechanistic, and clinical data from 2009 to 2025 to provide a structured, mechanism-informed approach for clinicians. Across studies, DIP accounted for roughly 15-20% of secondary parkinsonism, disproportionately affecting older adults and women. Functional imaging with dopamine transporter single-photon emission computed tomography typically demonstrates preserved striatal uptake, aiding differentiation from neurodegenerative parkinsonism. Recovery usually occurs within six to 12 months of discontinuing the offending agent, though a minority may experience persistent symptoms. The proposed three-step approach emphasizes comprehensive medication and supplement review, recognition of characteristic clinical patterns, and timely withdrawal with follow-up to confirm reversibility. This framework supports safer prescribing practices, reinforces clinician education, and enhances detection of this preventable condition.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.