SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impact of Particulate Matter 2.5 on Neurological Diseases: Insights Into Pathophysiological and Molecular Mechanisms.

J Toxicol · 2025-12-30

DOI: 10.1155/jt/5752904PMID: 41498103

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundFine particulate matter (PM2.5) has been significantly linked to the progression of various neurological and neurodegenerative diseases.ObjectiveThis review aims to elucidate the molecular and pathophysiological effects induced by chronic exposure to PM2.5 in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's, multiple sclerosis, and epilepsy.IntroductionPM2.5 penetrates the central nervous system (CNS) via the olfactory nerve or by disrupting the blood-brain barrier (BBB), triggering oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and epigenetic alterations.DiscussionIn Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, PM2.5 exacerbates the accumulation of β-amyloid, hyperphosphorylated tau, and α-synuclein, while in Huntington's disease, it worsens toxicity mediated by mutant huntingtin. In multiple sclerosis, these particles intensify neuroinflammation and axonal damage, whereas in epilepsy, they promote neuronal hyperexcitability and recurrent seizures. These mechanisms contribute to neuronal damage, symptom progression, and functional decline.ConclusionThis evidence highlights the urgent need for strict environmental policies to reduce PM2.5 exposure and further research to develop therapeutic strategies that mitigate its effects on neurological diseases, thereby improving the health of vulnerable populations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.