SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Compartment-specific correlation of pathological α-synuclein in prodromal Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2026-01-05

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2026.108178PMID: 41512492

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionNeuronal α-synuclein dyshomeostasis and aggregation are essential features of early Parkinson's disease, as seen in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). The link between these pathologies across body compartments remains unclear. Our aim was to assess correlations between α-synuclein aggregates in stool and urine with α-synuclein content in neuronally derived L1CAM extracellular vesicles (L1EVs) from serum in iRBD.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study, analyzing concurrent biobank samples from 46 individuals with iRBD to quantify α-synuclein aggregates in stool and urine with surface-based fluorescence intensity distribution analysis (sFIDA) and α-synuclein content in L1EVs using electrochemiluminescence.ResultsCorrected for age and sex, α-synuclein concentrations in L1EVs significantly correlated with stool aggregate concentration. No significant correlation was observed between α-synuclein concentration in L1EVs and urine, nor between urine and stool aggregates.ConclusionThe correlation of serum and stool α-synuclein suggests shared or linked pathology across these compartments, whereas the urinary compartment may be pathophysiologically distinct in prodromal Parkinson's Disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.