SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Metabolomic breath landscape analysis unravels lipid biomarker candidates in patients with genetic and idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

NPJ Parkinsons Dis · 2026-01-10

DOI: 10.1038/s41531-025-01255-xPMID: 41519835

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurodegenerative disorder. The current lack of efficient early diagnostic tools necessitates novel approaches to biomarker discovery. We propose an untargeted metabolomics approach using non-invasive exhaled breath analysis. Breath samples, collected from 73 PD patients, encompassing both genetic (LRRK2: n = 12, GBA1: n = 35, PRKN: n = 6) and idiopathic PD (n = 20), 4 unaffected LRRK2 pathogenic variant carriers, and 90 controls underwent extreme-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis. Findings were compared with metabolomics data from blood plasma. Biostatistical analyses identified discernible metabolic patterns in both biofluids, enabling differentiation of PD patients from healthy controls (OOB error < 1%). Metabolomic breath profiling of PD patients yielded 7 significant metabolites putatively identified as tricosanoic acid, docosanamide, eicosanoic acid, homophytanic acid, nonadecyl-MG, stearic acid, and palmitic acid in PD patients, irrespective of the genetic status. Five of these metabolites were also found in unaffected carriers of pathogenic variants in LRRK2 when compared to controls. Most of the proposed structures are intermediates in fatty acid metabolism, introducing new candidate biomarkers for breath analysis in PD, although their identities require MS/MS confirmation. Breath analysis effectively distinguishes between PD patients and healthy controls and can identify metabolites that could serve as noninvasive biomarkers for PD, potentially including its presymptomatic stage.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.