Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
PurposeWe previously proposed that a probability-based sympathetic 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) index (SMILe) could distinguish the presence or absence of Lewy body disease (LBD) based on findings at a single center. However, whether the model would be useful in the real world remained uncertain. Therefore, we updated and evaluated its performance at five Japanese and three European institutions.MethodsWe compared data from 967 patients with suspected LBD with 62 controls from a normal database (NDB). Of 815 patients with guideline-based diagnoses, 483 had LBD (Parkinson disease [PD] or dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB]) and 332 did not have LBD. Heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratios were standardized using a phantom-based method. Logistic regression models included early and late H/M ratios, age, sex, and comorbidities. We assessed diagnostic performance using ROC analysis and cross-validation.ResultsThe updated model discriminated LBD from other diseases (AUC for early and late H/M, 0.880 0.899, respectively). Age correction of H/M ratios based on the NDB did not improve accuracy. Median early H/M ratios [SMILe probability] were 3.09 [12.8%] for NDB, 2.57 [37.5%] for Alzheimer disease, 1.76 [84.7%] for PD, and 1.62 [89.0%] for DLB, with significantly lower H/M ratios and higher probabilities in PD and DLB compared with controls (p ConclusionThe probability-based 123I-mIBG model reliably differentiated LBD from other diseases. Standardization among sites supports global applicability and reflects real-world clinical practice.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.