SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Amplitude symbolic analysis: a tool for the evaluation of the autonomic function complementary to traditional symbolic approach.

Comput Biol Med · 2026-01-16

DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2026.111473PMID: 41547051

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Symbolic analysis (SA) infers cardiac control from spontaneous stationary sequences of heart period (HP) by estimating the probability of symbolic pattern classes. Unfortunately, SA does not assess the fraction of HP variability associated with symbolic pattern families. This study proposes amplitude SA (ASA) accounting for absolute changes between consecutive HPs. ASA leverages uniform 6-bin quantization to symbolize HP, the delay embedding procedure to form length-3 symbolic patterns and a traditional strategy to group symbolic patterns into four classes families according to number and sign of variations between adjacent symbols. ASA computes the fraction of variance associated with symbolic pattern classes. ASA was applied to HP variability derived from: 1) healthy subjects during pharmacological challenges (n = 9; age: 25-46 yrs, 9 males); 2) healthy subjects during graded postural stimuli (n = 19; age: 21-48 yrs, 8 males); 3) Parkinson disease (PD) patients (n = 12; age: 55-79 yrs, 8 males) and matched healthy controls (n = 12; age: 58-72 yrs, 7 males). We computed both global and local ASA markers and we compared them with SA indexes. Over stationary HP series we found that: i) ASA provides a general method to decompose HP variance according to symbolic pattern classes; ii) ASA is useful to describe cardiac control; iii) ASA indexes are complementary to SA markers; iv) ASA emphasizes the link of HP variability markers expressed in absolute units with vagal control; v) global and local ASA approaches provide similar information. SA and ASA should be utilized concomitantly for a deeper characterization of cardiac control from spontaneous HP fluctuations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.