SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Neuromodulation of Cortical Targets in Freezing of Gait.

Eur J Neurosci · 2026-01-01

DOI: 10.1111/ejn.70406PMID: 41574817

Open accessbrief-report; Review; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a disabling feature of Parkinson's Disease (PD) with unclear underlying pathophysiology. Evidence from multimodal neuroimaging studies suggests that complex interactions between cortical and subcortical areas may occur in FOG. While noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), can effectively modulate large-scale networks involved in FOG, the development of noninvasive neuromodulation interventions is limited by an incomplete understanding of the interactions between underlying network disruptions and FOG behavior. Recent studies have brought into question whether observed network changes in FOG are truly causal or secondary, and if secondary, are they adaptive, maladaptive, or not related? Although these questions go beyond correlative analyses, neuromodulation approaches provide an opportunity to systematically alter networks involved in FOG, providing evidence of a causal relationship. Here, we present evidence from noninvasive neuromodulation interventions of multiple cortical targets and their effects on behavior. In an attempt to leverage prior work to shed light onto the pathophysiology of FOG, we provide specific definitions of key aspects of gait behavior. We also aim to provide a framework under which adaptive and maladaptive network changes can be interpreted and targeted for the development of neuromodulation interventions. We encourage the design of future neuromodulation studies to consider including multimodal outcomes that will expand our understanding of the relationship between FOG behavior and treatment related network changes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.