Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Pathogenic mutations in Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are the predominant genetic cause of Parkinson's disease (PD) and often increase kinase activity, making LRRK2 inhibitors promising treatment options. Although LRRK2 kinase inhibitors are advancing clinically, non-invasive readouts of LRRK2-linked pathway modulation remain limited. Profiling urinary proteomes from 1215 individuals across three cohorts and integrating whole-genome sequencing from >500 participants to map genotype-proteome associations, we identified 177 urinary proteins associated with pathogenic LRRK2, enriched for lysosomal/glycosphingolipid, immune, and membrane-trafficking pathways. Machine learning narrowed the features to a cohort-agnostic 30-protein panel that classified G2019S carriers with a mean ROC AUC of 0.91 across independent tests. To evaluate translation, we performed multi-organ and urinary proteomics in rat gain- and loss-of-function models (BAC-LRRK2G2019S and Lrrk2KO) and after Lrrk2 inhibition (MLi-2 and PF-475), revealing tissue-specific responses-strongest in kidney-and cross-species overlap, including 24 brain proteins detectable in human urine. Rat-derived perturbations predicted LRRK2 mutation status in patients (AUC 0.75) and reversed with Lrrk2 inhibition, supporting their pharmacodynamic utility. Together, our findings establish urine as a scalable, non-invasive matrix that captures systemic and brain-relevant consequences of LRRK2 dysfunction and nominate candidate pharmacodynamic markers set to support LRRK2-directed trials.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.