Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. However, postoperative outcomes vary with no reliable predictive method.MethodsOur study involves 43 PD patients undergoing STN-DBS. Preoperative resting-state functional magnetic resonance imagings (rs-fMRI) were collected. The volume of tissue activated (VTA) was defined based on contact points and stimulation parameters. A model of the cortico-basal ganglia network was established using dynamic causal modeling. The correlation between the UPDRS-III and the network edges was determined through Pearson correlation analysis. Furthermore, a generalized linear model was employed to predict the post-DBS motor improvement.ResultsIndividual STN-VTA intersections were found to be important to UPDRS-III improvement induced by DBS (R = 0.59, P = 0.001). STN-VTA intersections were related to the thalamic-primary motor cortex (M1) (R = 0.47, P = 0.005), and M1-STN (R = 0.40, P = 0.006) coupling strength. The coupling strength of Thal-M1 (R = 0.442, P = 0.009) and M1-STN (R = 0.481 P = 0.004) resulted in DBS-induced movement enhancement, particularly rigidity. The strength of effective connections within the STN-Thal-M1 pathway was found to predict improvements in UPDRS-III scores (P = 0.003).ConclusionOur study confirmed the relationship between clinical improvements in STN-DBS and target location as well as the stimulation parameters. By constructing personalized cortical-basal ganglia network models based on target location as well as the stimulation parameters, we discovered that the effective connection strength in STN-THA-M1 can predict motor improvement in PD patients undergoing STN-DBS.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.