SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Non-canonical cell death in neurodegeneration: emerging mechanisms and therapeutic Frontiers.

Apoptosis · 2026-02-16

DOI: 10.1007/s10495-026-02260-yPMID: 41699331

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases, specifically Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) are defined by progressively increased neuronal loss that lacks curative therapies. Increasing evidence supports that non-canonical regulated cell death pathways including ferroptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and parthanatos, are implicated in pathological mechanisms of neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, likely impacting neurodegenerative pathologies. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the molecular pathways and potential pathogenic implications of these cell death pathways in neurodegenerative diseases, highlighting their upstream triggers, regulatory proteins, and downstream effectors. We also briefly describe representative pharmacological agents, including ferrostatin-1, necrostatin-1, MCC950 and PARP-inhibitors, that have shown neuroprotective effects in experimental studies. Experimental studies provide valuable information, but translation to clinical treatments presents barriers including overlapping regulated cell death mechanisms, constraints of bloodbrain barrier penetrance and concern for safety. Future development may come through concepts such as biomarker-based patient stratification strategies, multivalent interventions, and improved translational models. Identifying these new regulated cell death pathways may eventually provide new avenues to slow the progression of neurodegeneration and develop more targeted therapies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.