SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

CD4+T cell metabolic reprogramming as therapeutic targets in neurodegenerative diseases.

Mol Brain · 2026-02-25

DOI: 10.1186/s13041-026-01282-6PMID: 41742223

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases are a group of disorders characterized by the progressive loss of structure and function of neurons in the brain and/or peripheral nervous system. The main pathological feature of neurodegenerative disease in the central nervous system (CNS) is the selective neuronal loss in the brain and spinal cord, leading to cognitive and/or motor dysfunction. The immune system plays a variety of roles in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative diseases. CD4+T cells are being recognized as important immunometabolic modulators in the pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disorders (ND), including multiple sclerosis (MS), Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Their varied metabolic patterns provide a special therapeutic window for regulating neuroinflammation, spanning from lipid-dependent regulatory T cells (Tregs) to glycolysis-driven pro-inflammatory subsets (Th1, Th17). Abnormal immune metabolism raises the risk of oxidative stress, mitochondrial malfunction, and neuronal death in neurodegenerative environments. According to recent research, altering CD4 T cell metabolism to favour oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid oxidation (FAO) may help Treg function return and inhibit harmful effector responses. Current research on CD4 T cell immunometabolic pathways, their interactions with CNS-resident cells, and the developing possibility of metabolic intervention to slow neurodegeneration is explained in this review. By examining important signaling pathways including AMPK, mTORC1, and ROS dynamics, we demonstrate how CD4+T cell metabolism may reshape ND treatment approaches.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.