Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation tool for investigating the neurophysiology of different neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and other parkinsonian syndromes and movement disorders. Briefly, TMS enables targeted stimulation of specific cortical regions through externally applied magnetic pulses, avoiding surgical intervention (as it occurs in deep brain stimulation) and making it a safe, repeatable, and well-tolerated approach. Over the past two decades, extensive research has explored the clinical utility of TMS in PD, with particular emphasis on motor cortex excitability, synaptic plasticity, and functional connectivity, which are central contributors to both motor and non-motor symptoms in PD patients. In addition, repetitive TMS and related stimulation paradigms have been shown to positively modulate cortical plasticity, i.e., the brain's capacity to reorganize neural circuits, suggesting potential benefits for longer-term non-pharmacological management and rehabilitation protocols. More recently, studies have also investigated the role of TMS in atypical and secondary parkinsonisms, indicating that it may help characterize distinct neurophysiological abnormalities and provide symptomatic improvement in selected patients. This narrative expert review provides a comprehensive summary of TMS applications across the wide spectrum of parkinsonian syndromes, highlighting not only clinical potential, but also methodological limitations and future research directions.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.