SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Magnetic Field-Guided Magnetic Nanoparticles as Neurotherapeutics for Neurological Disorders and Glioblastoma.

Life (Basel) · 2026-02-09

DOI: 10.3390/life16020293PMID: 41752929

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and stroke, are among the most devastating neurological disorders worldwide. Glioblastoma (GBM) is a rapidly growing cancer that originates in astrocytes in the brain. It invades and damages the nervous system. Current treatment options remain limited, primarily due to poor blood-brain barrier penetration, lack of targeted delivery, and limited efficacy in slowing disease progression or promoting functional recovery. In recent years, magnetic fields (MFs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, with mechanisms of action that include direct neuromodulation and the guidance of magnetically responsive nanocarriers to the lesion. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), owing to their unique magnetic properties, biocompatibility, and responsiveness to external MFs, have emerged as promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of neurological diseases and glioblastoma. Exosome-magnetic complexes combine biological carriers with magnetic responsiveness to enhance targeting and biocompatibility for the treatment of neurological diseases and glioblastoma. This review highlights recent advances in magnetic field- and MNP-based neuroprotective strategies and explores new methods for targeted intervention and translational research using exosome-MNP complexes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.