SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Non-ICANS neurotoxicities CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and the emergence of movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events: a case report.

Front Immunol · 2026-02-16

DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1749587PMID: 41777880

Open accessJournal Article; Case Reports; case-reportOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

We report a 63-year-old male patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who developed delayed-onset neurotoxicity on day +22 following CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), after an initial episode of CRS and ICANS. The underlying disease had relapsed with secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement, highlighting a high-risk setting for neurotoxicity. Unlike classical ICANS, the syndrome featured progressive gait ataxia and hypokinetic movement disturbances-clinical hallmarks of so-called movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs), a syndrome often referred to as parkinsonism due to characteristic features such as bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and cognitive slowing. To date, such MNTs have only been reported in patients receiving BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell products, primarily for multiple myeloma. Our report is, to the best of our knowledge, the first documented case of an MNT-like syndrome following CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy. The patient's symptoms evolved subacutely, in the absence of radiographic progression, infection, or lymphoma relapse. Immunophenotyping revealed activated effector-memory CD8+ T cells (HLA-DR+/CD38+/CD28-/PD1+) in peripheral blood, and predominantly CAR T cells in cerebrospinal fluid. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels rose significantly in serum and CSF, indicating neuroaxonal injury. Steroid therapy led to partial clinical improvement. Follow-up neuropsychological testing revealed persistent deficits in attention and processing speed. This case broadens the known neurotoxicity spectrum of CAR T-cell therapies and underscores the need for heightened clinical vigilance and refined diagnostic criteria beyond ICANS, even in CD19-targeted settings.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.