SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Inflammatory signaling differentially changes chromatin accessibility and gene expression of the PD- associated kinase LRRK2 between human and mice.

Mol Neurodegener · 2026-03-18

DOI: 10.1186/s13024-026-00938-0PMID: 41851867

Open accessResearch Support, N.I.H., Intramural; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The genomic locus that encodes the Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene is highly pleiotropic and associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Coding variants associated with risk of PD act as gain of function kinase mutations increasing phosphorylation of RAB substrates, and non-coding variants in the promoter region of LRRK2 increase expression of the gene, notably in immune cells. If regulation of LRRK2 expression is a causal contributor to PD, it is important to understand the mechanism(s) by which LRRK2 is regulated, particularly in the context of inflammation. Here, we show that interferon-ɣ exposure induces robust LRRK2 activation in human iPSC-derived microglia through signaling of the Janus-activated Kinase complex to phosphorylate STAT1, which then binds to the LRRK2 promoter and is associated with remodeling of chromatin structure in this genomic locus. Additional regulatory mechanisms include the stress-induced transcription factor and long non-coding RNA encoded at the same locus, resulting in increased LRRK2 mRNA levels. We also show evidence of the same effect in acutely cultured human brain slices. While we were unable to demonstrate any induction of Lrrk2 mRNA in the mouse brain, the introduction of a human bacterial artificial chromosome transgene into the mouse genome recapitulated sensitivity to interferon-ɣ in microglia. A comparative genomic analysis across mammals suggests that these species differences are driven by regulatory regions upstream of LRRK2 that are specific to anthropoid primates. These results demonstrate that there are differences between species in how genes associated with human diseases are regulated and provide important information that should be incorporated in disease modeling.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.