SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Relationship between susceptibility to neurodegenerative diseases and genetic factors in populations exposed to mercury in Medellín, Colombia

Biomedica · 2026-03-02

DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.7634PMID: 41875454

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; English AbstractOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionNeurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s are associated with genetic and environmental factors, including exposure to mercury, a heavy metal with neurotoxic effects.ObjectivesTo identify and analyze alleles and genes linked to neurodegenerative diseases in relation to mercury exposure in Colombia.Materials and methodsScientific literature and population genotype data from public databases were reviewed, covering 94 Colombian adults genotyped under the CLM (Colombians from Medellín) reference. Data traceability was ensured through ID registration in the 1000 Genomes project database, guaranteeing informed consent and bioethical approval. Eleven genes (GSTP1, ATP7B, BDNF, GCLC, GCLM, MT1A, MT4, ABCC2, ABCB1, GPX1 y GPX4) with 18 polymorphisms distributed across ten chromosomes were analyzed using the SNPstatsTM program. The c² test was applied to evaluate the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, considering deviations with p ResultsThe results showed a high probability of an association between neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s and mercury exposure in individuals with genetic variants related to glutathione metabolism and mercury transport and excretion pathways.ConclusionsGenetic alterations or their expression involving mercury bioaccumulation, its crossing of the blood-brain barrier, central nervous system inflammation, and oxidative stress from reactive oxygen and nitrogen species increase the risk of developing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.