SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The evolution of trends and technology in wearable sensors used to detect falls in people with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.

Front Neurorobot · 2026-03-13

DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2026.1766109PMID: 41907649

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundNeurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a significant threat to human health. Numerous research demonstrated that patients with NDs might present with decreased balance, which is responsible for an increased risk of falling. As an emerging technology, wearable devices can detect falls and prevent privacy breaches.ObjectiveTo access the evolution of trends and technology in wearable devices to detect falls among patients with NDs.MethodsWe screened PubMed and Web of Science (February 2023) to summarize the pathway of fall detection with any body-worn sensor. Included articles were required to be full-text and published in English. Documents were excluded if they; (1) only used wearable devices for fall cueing, (2) did not offer sufficient information for data extraction, (3) did not use patients with NDs, (4) only used non-wearable sensors or devices.ResultsThe review identified 89 articles at the end of the procedure for data extraction. A wide variety existed in participant sample size (1-131), sensor types, placement and algorithms. 97.75% of papers (n = 87) used patients with Parkinson's disease as experimental subjects. 21.45% of studies attached devices on the ankle (n = 19), with a clear preference for using multiple types of sensors (58.43% of studies, n = 52). As the most commonly used inertial measurement unit (IMU), 21 articles utilized accelerometers and gyroscopes to assess falls. 39.33% of studies (n = 35) choose data set to verify the effectiveness of their algorithm. Machine learning algorithms have become prevalent since 2019, and the most commonly used algorithm was support vector machine (SVM) (n = 17).ConclusionThese results show that an increasing number of researchers examine the validation performance of their systems in non-real-time. The ankle was the preferred location among researchers, and there is a clear preference to use multiple types of sensors and machine learning algorithms to improve accuracy and immediacy. Future work should focus on other NDs instead of limiting to Parkinson's disease and consider an adequately studied population. A consensus on walking tasks and accuracy measurements is urgently needed. Performing studies in a simulated free-living environment for a specified time frame is advisable, with continuous real-time monitoring and assessment.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023405952).

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.