Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Incense burning is a widespread indoor combustion practice, yet its neurotoxic potential and impact on α-synuclein (α-Syn) proteostasis remain poorly defined. Using SH-SY5Y cells overexpressing α-Syn as a cellular Parkinson's disease model, we exposed cells to size-fractionated incense aerosol extracts (IAE) prepared as organic-phase (OP) or water-soluble phase (WP). α-Syn overexpression augmented vulnerability to IAE, producing greater losses in viability and pronounced increases in intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), mitochondrial membrane potential depolarization, and engagement of programmed cell-death pathways. Live-cell fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) revealed that both OP-IAE and WP-IAE shifted α-Syn from oligomeric to monomeric states in the cytosol, indicating disruption of oligomerization equilibrium. Antioxidant intervention revealed mechanistic differences compared with other indoor air pollutants, cigarette smoke. OP-IAE-induced cytotoxicity cannot be mitigated by N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or rutin, whereas WP-IAE-induced toxicity was partially attenuated, with NAC surpassing rutin. By contrast, for cigarette aerosol extracts (CAE), both OP- and WP-CAEs were robustly rescued by NAC and, to a lesser extent, rutin. Together, these results indicate that incense aerosols, particularly OP-IAE, engage reactive oxygen species (ROS)-linked mitochondrial injury and programmed cell-death pathways while uniquely driving α-Syn monomerization, while exhibiting relative resistance to classical antioxidant intervention compared with cigarette aerosols. This work points out incense smoke as a distinct indoor neurotoxicant with implications for α-Syn homeostasis and Parkinsonian risk in exposed populations.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.