SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Sarcopenia, body composition, physical performance, and clinical features in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional comparative study.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) · 2026-03-17

DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1793254PMID: 41924518

Open accessComparative Study; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTo compare sarcopenia prevalence, body composition, physical performance, and related clinical features between middle-aged and older patients with mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease (PD) and matched controls.MethodsA cross-sectional study carried out at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. Patients with PD in Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3 and controls matched for age, sex and comorbidities were assessed. We measured handgrip strength with a hand dynamometer. Body composition and muscle mass were evaluated using DEXA. Sarcopenia was diagnosed following EWGSOP2 criteria. Clinical, cognitive and nutritional assessments were also performed.ResultsThe study population comprised 250 patients (124 with PD), of whom one hundred and nine (43.6%) were female. The median age was 69.5 (IQR 61.9 - 76). Similar prevalences of sarcopenia were found among PD patients (9.7%) and controls (11.1%). PD patients had higher SARC-F scores, worse balance, higher gait speed, and more frequent falls. After adjustment for age, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes, quantile regression showed a downward trend in handgrip strength and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index among PD patients, with a significant muscle mass reduction at the 40th percentile. PD patients also had lower calf circumference and fat mass, despite higher protein intake.ConclusionPatients with PD had worse balance, greater fall risk, and lower muscle mass and calf circumference compared to controls, despite similar sarcopenia prevalence. These results highlight subtle but potentially clinically relevant impairments that may not be captured by traditional mean-based analyses and categorical sarcopenia diagnosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.