SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Brain-gut-microbiota axis: a review on the bidirectional regulatory mechanisms between gut microbiota and brain and their disease interactions.

Front Microbiol · 2026-03-27

DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1768891PMID: 41971333

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTo synthesize current evidence on the bidirectional regulatory mechanisms of the Brain-Gut-Microbiota Axis (BGMA), its perturbation by external factors, and its clinical implications for neurodegenerative, psychiatric, metabolic, and gastrointestinal disorders.DesignNarrative review integrating preclinical and clinical evidence.Data sourcesPubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library searches (2000-2023) using keywords: "brain-gut-axis," "microbiota," "dysbiosis," "neuroinflammation," "SCFAs," "neurodegeneration," "psychobiotics."ResultsDiet, stress, antibiotics, and environment significantly alter gut microbiota composition (e.g., reducing diversity, shifting Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio). Dysbiosis disrupts BGMA communication via: (1) Neural pathways (vagus nerve modulation); (2) Immune activation (cytokine release, neuroinflammation); (3) Microbial metabolites (SCFAs, tryptophan derivatives, TMAO). These disruptions are associated with Alzheimer's disease (reduced Faecalibacterium, amyloid deposition), Parkinson's (elevated TMAO, α-synuclein aggregation), and depression (altered serotonin synthesis), though causality remains to be established in human studies.ConclusionThe BGMA is a critical mediator of systemic health. Dysbiosis contributes to disease pathogenesis through defined neural, immune, and metabolic pathways. Targeting the microbiota offers novel therapeutic strategies. Future research must prioritize translational studies validating microbial biomarkers and interventions in human cohorts.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.