Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundFreezing of gait (FoG) is a common symptom of Parkinson's disease, especially in its later stages of progression. Characterized by involuntary stopping during normal gait patterns, FoG greatly increases fall risk, reducing quality of life. Given the complex presentation and etiology of FoG, current treatments have proven ineffective in managing episodes. In recent years, machine learning algorithms have been leveraged to derive actionable clinical insights from biomedical datasets. As a manifestation of neuromechanical dysfunction, impending FoG episodes may be characterized through data collected by wearable devices and sensors.ObjectiveThis scoping review evaluates the current landscape of machine and deep learning-derived biomarkers to enhance the personalized management of FoG.MethodsThis scoping review was conducted using established methodological frameworks for scoping reviews and is reported in accordance using the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Three databases were queried, with screening yielding 60 studies.ResultsThirty-nine papers reported on deep learning techniques, with the most common architectures being convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory models.ConclusionsInertial measurement units, which can be worn on various locations, may be a promising modality for practical implementation. To generate closed-loop FoG therapies, algorithms can be integrated into real-time systems like robotic exoskeletons or adaptive deep brain stimulation. Future work in generating datasets from ambulatory devices, as well as distributed computing strategies, may lead to real-time FoG management.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.