SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Parkinson's Disease: A Comprehensive Review.

Cureus · 2026-03-14

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.105206PMID: 41982578

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a gradual neurodegenerative condition characterized by dopaminergic neuron death, α-synuclein pathology, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Current treatments (levodopa, deep brain stimulation (DBS), etc.) are mainly symptomatic and have limited effect on slowing disease progression. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are emerging candidates for a disease-modifying approach because they can modulate both the adaptive and innate immune responses, secreting neurotrophic and pro-angiogenic factors, affecting glial phenotype, and delivering extracellular vesicles/exosomes, which may lessen neuroinflammation and/or proteotoxic stress. Early-phase clinical research (phase 1 dose escalation of intravenous (IV) allogeneic bone marrow (BM)-derived MSCs; recent phase 2 randomized placebo-controlled IV allogeneic MSC trials) indicates that MSCs may be feasible and safe in the short term, although these have demonstrated some symptomatic benefits in motor outcomes. However, notable variability exists across dosing regimens, and significant placebo effects were observed. In this review, we summarize the sources of MSCs, relevant mechanisms of MSC activity in PD biology (including preclinical evidence), clinical trial results, safety issues, routes of administration, and challenges (including potency assays, batch variation, endpoint selection, durability, and regulatory/ethical limitations). We conclude that MSC-based interventions in PD remain investigational, and future clinical trials should focus on standardizing manufacturing processes, utilizing robust potency metrics, incorporating biomarker-rich designs, and selecting clinically meaningful endpoints.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.