SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dually Acting Ligands Targeting Serotonin Receptors: Implications in CNS Disorders.

J Med Chem · 2026-04-27

DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c03094PMID: 42044264

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The serotonergic system remains a critical focus of neuropsychopharmacology due to its widespread influence on mood, cognition, and behavior. Despite the clinical success of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), their long-term efficacy is limited by receptor heterogeneity, desensitization, and compensatory adaptations. Recent advances suggest that ligands simultaneously modulating two serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes may offer superior therapeutic outcomes. This perspective summarizes progress in developing such dually acting compounds for CNS disorders, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, and mood disorders. Clinically relevant examples include flibanserin (5-HT1A receptor agonist/5-HT2A receptor antagonist), pimavanserin (5-HT2A/5-HT2C receptors inverse agonist), and eltoprazine (5-HT1A/5-HT1B receptors partial agonist), alongside experimental 5-HT2A/5-HT6, 5-HT3/5-HT6 or TAAR1/5-HT2C receptors ligands. Integrating structure-activity insights and clinical findings, we discuss challenges of rational dual modulation. Advances in biased signaling, targeting distinctive conformational states, and optopharmacology utilizing photochromic ligands may further enable the design of innovative dually acting agents with improved efficacy and safety profiles.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.