SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

High-Intensity Alternating Current Stimulation as an Add-On to Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation for Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

CNS Neurosci Ther · 2026-04-01

DOI: 10.1002/cns.70909PMID: 42046417

Open accessresearch-article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

AimsIn this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, we explored whether high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (Hi-tACS), as an add-on to multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation therapy (MIRT), could yield more durable quality of life (QoL) improvements than MIRT alone.MethodsSixty patients with Parkinson's disease (PwP) (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-3, aged 45-70) were assigned (1:1) to receive 10 days of MIRT with either twice-daily Hi-tACS (15 mA, 77.5 Hz, 40 min/session) or sham stimulation. The primary outcome was the longitudinal change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) total score from baseline to 4, 12, and 24 weeks after intervention. Secondary outcomes included changes in motor and non-motor symptom scales. Adverse events were monitored throughout the intervention period.ResultsGeneralized estimating equation analysis revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for PDQ-39 total scores (Pgroup × time = 0.008). The Hi-tACS+MIRT group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in PDQ-39 scores than the sham-Hi-tACS+MIRT group at 4 weeks (T2: effect size = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.14-1.21; PFDR = 0.009), 12 weeks (T3: effect size = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.80-2.05; PFDR = 0.003), and 24 weeks (T4: effect size = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.65-1.85; PFDR ConclusionsThis trial demonstrated that the Hi-tACS add-on to MIRT could maintain long-term improvements in QoL and improve non-motor symptoms for PwP, providing a new strategy for PwP rehabilitation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.