SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Breakthroughs and challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in treating hematologic malignancies of the central nervous system.

Blood Sci · 2026-04-27

DOI: 10.1097/bs9.0000000000000289PMID: 42064783

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has transformed hematologic cancer treatment; however, its application in patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement remains challenging because of exclusion from key trials. Recent data show that CAR-T cells can breach the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and achieve clinically significant responses in CNS lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and multiple myeloma (MM). However, limited CNS trafficking, antigen escape, an immunosuppressive microenvironment, and treatment-related neurotoxicity constrain therapeutic efficacy. This review synthesizes recent clinical outcomes, elucidates mechanisms of CNS infiltration and neurotoxicity, and evaluates emerging strategies, including optimized CAR designs, BBB-modulating technologies, alternative delivery routes, and rational combination therapies, to enhance safety and efficacy. Disease-specific nuances, such as Parkinson-like symptoms in CNS myeloma and differential neurotoxicity profiles between primary and secondary CNS lymphomas, are highlighted. By identifying key knowledge gaps and proposing prioritized research directions, this study aims to guide the future translation of CAR-T therapy for CNS hematologic malignancies.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.