SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Advances in music therapy for neurological rehabilitation.

Front Neurol · 2026-04-22

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1821915PMID: 42099975

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

This review systematically examines the advances, mechanisms, and clinical applications of music therapy in neurorehabilitation. The article first delineates the conceptual origins of music therapy and the developmental trajectory of neurologic music therapy, introducing the major technical classifications including receptive methods, active methods, improvisational approaches, and vibroacoustic music therapy. The core section elaborates on the multidimensional mechanisms underlying music therapy in neurorehabilitation, encompassing neuroanatomical networks, neurotrans Melodic Intonation Therapy and endocrine systems, neuroplasticity, and psychobehavioral dimensions, elucidating the functional recovery pathways through auditory-motor integration, neural network reorganization, and neuroplasticity enhancement. Regarding clinical applications, the article comprehensively discusses the specific implementations and evidence-based efficacy of music therapy in the rehabilitation of stroke, Parkinson's disease, and cerebral palsy, including improvements in motor, speech, and cognitive impairments. Finally, the article summarizes current challenges and outlines future directions, aiming to provide theoretical foundations and practical references for the standardized and precision application of music therapy in neurorehabilitation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.