Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Cognitive impairment is a disabling non-motor feature of Parkinson's disease (PD). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) α-synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) reflects Lewy body pathology, while reduced CSF amyloid-β42 (Aβ42) indicates Alzheimer's type co-pathology in PD. This study examined whether combined CSF α-synuclein SAA and Aβ42 status improves prediction of cognitive decline and dementia risk in PD. A total of 692 participants (145 controls and 547 individuals with PD) from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative with available CSF α-synuclein SAA and Aβ42 measurements were included. Participants were classified into four biomarker-defined groups based on α-synuclein/amyloid (S/A) status: S - A- (n = 140), S - A+ (n = 67), S + A- (n = 307), and S + A+ (n = 178). At baseline, α-synuclein SAA positivity was highly prevalent in PD (87.2%). APOE ε4 carrier frequency differed significantly across groups (p < 0.001), with the highest prevalence in S - A+ (50.8%) and S + A+ (33.7%). The S + A+ group exhibited the lowest baseline cognitive scores, with intermediate deficits in S + A-. Longitudinally, S + A+ participants showed the steepest cognitive decline (p < 0.001), whereas the S + A- and S - A+ groups demonstrated more modest but significant declines. In multivariable Cox regression, each one-category increase in S/A status was associated with a higher hazard of dementia (HR = 2.72, 95% CI 1.80-4.08, p < 0.001). Combined CSF α-synuclein and Aβ42 stratification identifies subgroups at high risk for accelerated cognitive decline and dementia, offering a potential strategy to improve prognostic precision and clinical trial design in PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.