SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Proximity proteomics reveals a co-evolved LRRK2-regulatory network linked to centrosomes.

EMBO Rep · 2026-05-23

DOI: 10.1038/s44319-026-00806-4PMID: 42177293

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) not only plays a vital role in familial forms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but also represents a risk factor for idiopathic PD. Its multi-domain architecture enables fine-tuned regulation of its biological function by orchestrating intra- and inter-molecular interactions. Here, we present BioID proximity proteomes of LRRK2 that reveal new interactors, which we further characterize using a novel evolutionary and structural bioinformatics pipeline. Co-evolutionary analysis of the protein-protein interaction network identifies a structural and functional module enriched in cytoskeletal components associated with the centrosome and microtubules. In addition, structural modeling of binary interactions using AlphaFold-Multimer reveals distinct groups of interactors that engage LRRK2 in a manner dependent on specific conformations and epitopes. Furthermore, we identify distinct changes in the LRRK2 proximity proteome that are induced by the type I kinase inhibitor MLi-2 or by co-expression of the LRRK2 upstream effector RAB29. Depending on its activity state and conformation, these protein-protein interactions link LRRK2 to defined cellular sub-compartments, including centriolar satellites and vesicular sub-compartments.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.