SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Baseline predictors of response to a group-based speech and communication intervention in Parkinson's disease: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

J Parkinsons Dis · 2026-05-25

DOI: 10.1177/1877718x261453191PMID: 42183643

Open accessresearch-article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSpeech and voice symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease, yet predictors of response to behavioral speech interventions are unclear.ObjectivesTo identify predictors of responsiveness to a speech and communication group-intervention (HiCommunication) and contextualize findings against active controls.MethodsThis secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial included intervention completers. Responders were defined for voice intensity (increase ≥2 decibels) and voice quality (Acoustic Voice Quality Index decrease ≥0.54). Nineteen baseline clinical, motor, cognitive, perceptual, and acoustic variables were entered into Random Forest classifiers. Primary models excluded the baseline value of the target domain; baseline-including variants were sensitivity analyses. Performance was evaluated using Cohen's kappa, precision, recall, and specificity; key predictors were examined using partial dependence.ResultsIn HiCommunication (n = 35), the primary voice intensity model showed moderate agreement (kappa = 0.57; precision = 0.79; recall = 0.90; specificity = 0.64). Higher baseline perceptual ratings of reduced loudness and overall speech deviation, as well as higher Acoustic Voice Quality Index values, were associated with a higher predicted probability of improvement in voice intensity, whereas higher levodopa equivalent daily dose was associated with a lower response probability; postural instability/gait difficulty or tremor-dominant motor phenotypes showed higher response probability than the indeterminate phenotype. Voice quality models were below chance without baseline Acoustic Voice Quality Index but reached kappa 0.38 when included. Active control models showed low performance.ConclusionsClinically accessible baseline measures predicted improvement in voice intensity following HiCommunication with moderate accuracy. Perceptual ratings may support expectation-setting and individualized planning of group-based speech intervention in Parkinson's disease, but findings require replication.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03213873, doi: 10.1177/1545968321999053Plain Language TitleWho benefits most from group-based speech and communication therapy in Parkinson's disease? This study explored whether simple clinical and speech measures collected before treatment can help predict which people with Parkinson's disease are most likely to improve their voice loudness after participating in an intensive group-based speech and communication program.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.