Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundThe German Parkinson´s disease multimodal complex treatment (PD-MCT) is a structured multidisciplinary inpatient treatment for people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). However, data on its long-term effect are limited.MethodsA monocentric, non-blinded, clinical trial with randomized allocation and six-month follow-up was conducted at the Department of Neurology of the Jena University Hospital. At total of 120 patients admitted for PD-MCT were allocated 1:1 to two predefined treatment durations (short: 7-13 days; long: 14-20 days) according to the German Operation and Procedure Classification System (OPS; code 8-97d). The primary outcome was change in the Movement Disorder Society sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) part II after six months. Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life assessed by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 8 (PDQ-8) and the influence of treatment duration. Analyses were performed as-treated.ResultsIn 93 PwPD, MDS-UPDRS II improved by 3 points (r = 0.435; p 2(3) = 14.94; p = 0.002; R2 = 0.22). PDQ-8 improved by 8 points (r = 0.524; p 2(2) = 10.53; p = 0.005; R2 = 0.15). Treatment duration had no significant influence on MDS-UPDRS II (p = 0.611, Eta² = 0.001) or PDQ-8 (p = 0.809, Eta² = 0.001).ConclusionsPD-MCT is an effective multidisciplinary inpatient treatment with clinically relevant long-term effects up to six months. In clinical practice, the shorter treatment duration may be similarly effective in selected patients.Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00025225, registered 30 June 2021, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00025225 .
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.