Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways, particularly the Planar Cell Polarity (Wnt/PCP) and Wnt/Ca²⁺ branches, play critical roles in regulating neural development and maintaining cellular homeostasis within the nervous system. This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of the molecular and cellular functions of these pathways, with a focus on their involvement in cytoskeletal dynamics, cellular polarity, and calcium signaling. Non-canonical Wnt signaling is essential for key neurodevelopmental processes, including neural tube closure, neuronal migration, axon guidance, and synaptic plasticity, while its dysregulation contributes to the pathogenesis of both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, spina bifida, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. Particular emphasis is placed on the role of Dishevelled (DVL) as a shared intracellular signaling mediator across canonical and non-canonical Wnt pathways, as well as on the context-dependent activation of downstream effectors including Rho GTPases, protein kinase C (PKC), calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII), and nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT). In addition, emerging experimental platforms, including CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and human brain organoids, are highlighted for their utility in dissecting pathway-specific mechanisms and advancing translational applications. Overall, this review underscores the importance of non-canonical Wnt signaling as a dynamic and context-dependent regulatory network and discusses its potential as a target for precision-based therapeutic strategies in neurological disorders.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.