NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and stroke, remain major causes of global disability and mortality, with limited neuroprotective therapies available. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers multi-target therapeutic potential, but its mechanistic complexity requires systematic investigation using appropriate model systems. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) has emerged as a valuable vertebrate platform for TCM neuroprotection research due to its genetic homology with humans, optical transparency, and high-throughput screening compatibility. This review summarizes the application of zebrafish models in studying TCM for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cerebral ischemia, epilepsy, insomnia, depression, and spinal cord injury. Key findings indicate that TCM metabolites exert neuroprotective effects through multiple mechanisms, including anti-oxidative stress, anti-neuroinflammation, anti-apoptosis, neurotransmitter modulation, neurogenesis promotion, and vascular protection. Zebrafish models have proven particularly useful for high-throughput screening of active metabolites, real-time in vivo imaging of neurovascular processes, and rapid safety assessment. However, limitations such as the absence of a layered neocortex, differences in drug metabolism, and the predominantly acute nature of current models must be acknowledged. Addressing these challenges through model standardization, multi-omics integration, and cross-species validation will further enhance the translational relevance of zebrafish-based TCM research. This review provides a practical framework for leveraging zebrafish models to advance the mechanistic understanding and clinical development of neuroprotective TCM therapies.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.