SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

An automated workflow for quantifying the formation of synuclein aggregates in human dopaminergic neurons.

Methods · 2026-06-15

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2026.06.005PMID: 42297199

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by alpha-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates termed Lewy bodies. To model PD pathology in vitro, preformed fibrils of α-syn (PFFs), which can be taken up by cells, provide a seed that drives misfolding and aggregation of endogenous α-syn, with new aggregates amplifying this process. External application of PFFs to dopaminergic neurons (DNs) increases aggregate formation, marked by α-syn phosphorylation at serine 129 (pS129-syn), a pathological PD marker. Building on this, we developed an automated synuclein seeding assay to quantify new α-syn aggregates in iPSC-derived DNs. Using pS129-syn as a readout, we show that PFFs elicit a time- and dose-dependent increase in pS129-syn aggregates. Our automated seeding assay further revealed that aggregate formation depends on endogenous α-syn levels. Treatment with PFFs produced a greater increase in pS129-syn aggregates in iPSC DNs derived from a PD patient with a triplication in the SNCA gene, which encodes the α-syn protein and which elevates total α-syn levels, relative to DNs from an isogenic iPSC line from the same individual, in which the SNCA gene mutation had been corrected by CRISPR/Cas9. In contrast, no pS129-syn signal was detected in neurons in which all copies of the SNCA gene had been knocked out (KO). This proof-of-principle automated high-content imaging workflow for synuclein seeding has been validated using isogenic cell lines with defined SNCA copy number variants and it offers a platform for assessing compounds and therapeutics that may impede α-syn aggregate formation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.