SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effectiveness of a therapeutic program with chin tuck against resistance exercises compared to the chin-down maneuver in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Codas · 2026-06-15

DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20250191enPMID: 42307288

Open accessresearch-article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeInvestigate the effectiveness of a therapeutic program with chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) exercises, compared to the chin-down (CD) maneuver, on signs suggestive of dysphagia, maximum isometric tongue pressure, and therapeutic efficacy in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD).Methods26 individuals with primary PD were randomly assigned to two intervention groups for four weeks (one session per week). Group A performed the CTAR exercises (n = 13), and Group B performed the CD postural maneuver with swallowing training with different food consistencies (n = 13). The outcomes assessed were signs suggestive of dysphagia using the Northwestern Dysphagia Patient Check Sheet (NDPCS), maximum isometric tongue pressure (MIP), the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) to monitor therapeutic efficacy, and peak cough flow, before and after the intervention period.ResultsThe CTAR group showed a significant improvement in items related to the NDPCS, MIP, and EAT-10 compared to the CD group (p ConclusionPD patients who underwent an intervention program with CTAR exercises showed an improvement in signs suggestive of dysphagia and an increase in maximum isometric tongue pressure, compared to those who underwent the therapeutic program with the CD postural maneuver.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.