Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionParkinson's disease (PD) and Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders characterized by alpha-synuclein pathology. As current therapies largely target symptoms, there is a clear need for disease-modifying treatments. Emerging evidence links these disorders to glucose metabolism dysregulation, suggesting antidiabetic agents may hold therapeutic potential.MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study involving 12 subjects with PD or DLB to evaluate the tolerability and preliminary effects of a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitor (sitagliptin 100 mg) vs. sodium glucose like transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor (dapagliflozin 10 mg) over a 4-week period, compared to a placebo. We assessed changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) scores, cognitive function, and autonomic biomarkers. Both sitagliptin and dapagliflozin were well-tolerated, with no adverse events. While no significant changes were observed in cognitive scores, a significant difference was found in the change from baseline for MDS-UPDRS part 1 (P = 0.008), part 2 (P = 0.020), and total scores (P = 0.047) when comparing the three groups.DiscussionThe dapagliflozin group showed more favorable trends in MDS-UPDRS scores. Limitations include small study size and duration as well as all participants had PD except one subject in the DPP4 inhibitor group with DLB. This pilot study suggests that these inhibitors are safe in PD and DLB patients. The preliminary findings, particularly the trends in the dapagliflozin group, provide a basis for larger-scale, long-term studies to confirm these potential symptomatic benefits and explore disease-modifying effects.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06263673, identifier: NCT06263673.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.