SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Do Leg-Focused Exercises Improve Arm and Hand Function for Individuals With Neurologic Disorders? A Scoping Review.

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl · 2026-01-21

DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100572PMID: 42326573

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTo perform a scoping review summarizing existing literature on the use of leg exercises to improve arm function for individuals living with neurologic conditions.Data sourcesWe searched 5 databases (PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Cochrane Central), secondary references, and 9 gray literature databases from January 1, 1947, to October 28, 2025.Study selectionStudies were included if they involved adults living with neurologic conditions conducting leg-focused exercise programs that included an arm-specific outcome. All were written in English. Two reviewers independently screened all articles.Data extractionData were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second. Methodological quality was assessed using Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale.Data synthesisA total of 12 published studies met criteria. Studies involved 6-101 participants living with deficits because of stroke or Parkinsons disease. Participants performed leg-focused exercises, ranging from a single session up to 100 sessions, followed by upper extremity assessments. Of the 12 studies, 6 showed a statistically significant or clinically relevant benefit of leg exercise on arm function. However, these were mostly observed as incidental findings.ConclusionsThis scoping review highlights a gap in research on the use of leg training to activate arm motor circuits for individuals living with neurologic conditions. Future research should explore this approach as a novel method for neurorehabilitation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.