NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with limited disease-modifying therapies. PANoptosis, an integrated form of programmed cell death involving apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, has been implicated in neuroinflammation-related neurodegeneration. However, the roles of PANoptosis-related genes in PD remain unclear.MethodsWe performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using cis-eQTL instruments from the eQTLGen Consortium for 30 PANoptosis-related genes, with PD GWAS data from Nalls et al. 2019 as the outcome. Instrumental variables were selected using a hierarchical strategy, with genome-wide significant cis-eQTLs as primary instruments and a relaxed threshold applied only for genes with fewer than three independent SNPs. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger, weighted median, MR-PRESSO, MR-RAPS, and leave-one-out analyses. SMR/HEIDI testing and two-step MR mediation using 731 peripheral immune traits were also performed.ResultsGenetically predicted higher CXCL16 expression was associated with increased PD risk (OR = 1.115, 95% CI 1.060-1.173, p = 2.4 × 10-5), while higher FADD expression was associated with reduced PD risk (OR = 0.861, 95% CI 0.790-0.939, p = 7.1 × 10-4). CASP1 and IFI27 were nominally significant and considered exploratory. Sensitivity analyses were directionally consistent, although MR-Egger estimates were imprecise. SMR/HEIDI supported CXCL16. Exploratory mediation analysis identified 63/66 candidate immune mediators after FDR correction.ConclusionThese findings provide MR-based genetic evidence linking CXCL16 expression to PD risk, with exploratory mediation through peripheral immune phenotypes. The CXCL16-immune cell-PD axis warrants further experimental validation.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.