SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Phase Separation Drives Pathological Aggregation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A 15-Year Bibliometric Landscape (2009-2024).

Ann N Y Acad Sci · 2026-07-01

DOI: 10.1111/nyas.70311PMID: 42418280

Open accessresearch-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a biophysical driver of membraneless organelle assembly, is central to pathological aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases. Initially linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), LLPS dysregulation has now been implicated in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and frontotemporal dementia, where aberrant transitions convert dynamic condensates into insoluble fibrils. To systematically map this landscape, we employed CiteSpace-based bibliometrics to analyze 784 Web of Science articles from 2009 to 2024. Our analyses reveal dominant contributions from the United States, China, and Germany, with collaborative networks focusing on protein dynamics. Key hotspots include LLPS-driven aggregation of TARDBP (TDP-43), FUS, and α-synuclein, alongside stress granule dysfunction and nucleocytoplasmic transport defects. Emerging frontiers highlight therapeutic strategies targeting pathological condensates utilizing small-molecule chaperones and posttranslational modification modulators to restore cellular homeostasis. Our findings underscore LLPS as a critical axis bridging molecular pathology and translational innovation. The field is rapidly shifting from mechanistic exploration to therapeutic applications, emphasizing interventions to halt or reverse aggregation. By delineating global trends and changing priorities, our study highlights the transformative potential of phase-targeted interventions and provides a roadmap of groundbreaking interdisciplinary research into neurodegenerative disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.