SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Intranasal dopamine: Anatomical pathways, biological mechanisms and neuromodulatory potential.

Neurosci Biobehav Rev · 2026-07-11

DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106866PMID: 42435826

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Dopamine (DA) regulates motor control, motivation, learning and memory, cognition, and social behavior, and its dysregulation underlies a wide range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. In Parkinson's disease (PD), degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra depletes striatal DA, making dopaminergic restoration a central therapeutic target. Because DA does not cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), treatment relies on its precursor L-DOPA. Intranasal (IN) administration offers a non-invasive alternative: it enables rapid absorption, avoids hepatic first-pass metabolism, and provides partial brain access via nose-to-brain pathways, positioning IN-DA as a potential tool to directly influence central dopaminergic function. This review integrates current knowledge on IN-DA. We first examine nasal anatomy, the biological and physicochemical variables governing IN delivery, and the mechanisms of nose-to-brain transport, followed by a focused synthesis of IN-DA findings. Preclinical evidence shows that IN-DA and IN-L-DOPA increase extracellular DA levels and turnover in the striatum, with IN-DA appearing to enhance dopaminergic tone through presynaptic uptake and storage. Behaviorally, IN-DA produces state-dependent improvements across cognitive, emotional, and social domains, particularly in neuropsychiatric rodent models. Although nanoparticle-based DA formulations are being developed primarily to improve delivery efficiency for PD therapy, emerging evidence suggests that IN-DA may serve more broadly as a neuromodulatory approach for disorders involving catecholamine dysregulation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.