SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Stem cell extracellular vesicles for neuropsychiatric disorders and translation.

Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids · 2026-05-29

DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2026.14PMID: 42454195

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neuropsychiatric disorders represent a major global health challenge due to their high prevalence, chronic disability, and substantial socioeconomic burden. Although stem cell-based therapies offer regenerative potential, their clinical application is limited by poor post-transplantation survival, restricted targeted integration, and potential tumorigenicity. Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (SC-EVs), particularly exosomes, have emerged as a promising cell-free therapeutic approach. These vesicles can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and exhibit high biocompatibility and low immunogenicity. This review summarizes the cellular origins and biogenesis of SC-EVs and evaluates current preclinical and clinical evidence supporting their therapeutic potential. Particular attention is given to acute ischemic stroke and progressive neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. In addition, the molecular mechanisms underlying their neuroprotective and regenerative effects are discussed, with a focus on modulating neuroinflammation, promoting neurogenesis, and enhancing synaptic plasticity. Finally, key advances and major challenges in the clinical translation of SC-EVs are outlined. Integrating current evidence, this review provides a framework and practical perspective for the continued development of SC-EV-based therapies for complex neurological disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.