SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impacts of DNA ligase I genotypes on Taiwan Parkinson's disease.

Biomedicine (Taipei) · 2026-06-01

DOI: 10.37796/2211-8039.1681PMID: 42483441

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionGenetic polymorphisms in DNA repair pathways can modulate DNA repair capacity and influence susceptibility to aging-related disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD). This study evaluated the association between the DNA ligase I rs20579 polymorphism and PD risk.Materials and methodsGenotyping of DNA ligase I rs20579 was performed by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in 123 PD patients and 492 age- and sex-matched controls of Taiwanese Han ethnicity. Associations between rs20579 genotypes and PD risk were analyzed.ResultsAmong controls, the genotype distribution of rs20579 was 78.7 % GG, 19.3 % AG, and 2.0 % AA, compared with 75.6 %, 21.1 %, and 3.3 % among PD cases, respectively (p for trend = 0.6290). No significant differences were observed in the prevalence of AG (p = 0.6939) or AA (p = 0.4908) genotypes between cases and controls. Allelic analysis showed a non-significant increase in PD risk for A allele carriers (OR = 1.21, 95 % CI = 0.80-1.83, p = 0.4189). Stratified analysis revealed no significant genotype differences among males. In females, the AA genotype was associated with a borderline increased risk of PD (OR = 1.86, 95 % CI = 1.00-3.47, p = 0.0526).ConclusionIn this Taiwanese Han cohort, the DNA ligase I rs20579 A allele may be a genetic marker of increased PD susceptibility in females. Further studies in larger, independent populations are warranted to confirm its clinical relevance.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.