Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundGLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) show promise for Parkinson's disease (PD), but their comprehensive efficacy and safety profiles remain unclear.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trials (n = 850 PD patients) evaluating GLP-1RAs (Exenatide, Lixisenatide, Liraglutide, NLY01) versus placebo over treatment periods of 36-52 weeks and follow-up durations of 8-12 weeks (except one study with a 12-month follow-up). Outcomes included motor/non-motor symptoms assessed by validated scales and adverse events.ResultsGLP-1RAs significantly improved motor function post-treatment (SMD = -0.21, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.07, p = 0.003; I 2 = 70.2%) and at follow-up (SMD = -0.32, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.08, p = 0.009; I 2 = 48.5%). Exploratory analyses suggested an association between GLP-1RA treatment and improved mood outcomes post-treatment (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI -0.58 to -0.14, p = 0.001; I 2 = 54.0%) and sustained at follow-up (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.06, p = 0.013; I 2 = 0.0%). Cognitive function improved during follow-up (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.18, p I 2 = 1.1%). Weight loss (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.88 to 7.94, p I 2 = 47.7%) and gastrointestinal disorders (OR = 2.85, 95% CI 2.29 to 3.54, p I 2 = 32.4%) were more frequent with GLP-1RAs, but PD symptom exacerbation was reduced (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94, p = 0.025; I 2 = 0.0%).ConclusionGLP-1RAs provide multidimensional benefits in PD, extending beyond motor control to mood and cognition. These findings support their therapeutic repurposing, with side effects being manageable.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251170531, CRD420251170531.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.