SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Integrative Insights Into DYRK1A From Molecular Function to Therapeutic Advancement.

Chem Biol Drug Des · 2026-07-01

DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.70366PMID: 42494118

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A), located within the Down syndrome critical region and implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and context-dependent cancer biology, represents a high-value yet challenging therapeutic target. This review compiles comprehensive structure-activity relationship (SAR) insights essential for medicinal chemists designing selective DYRK1A inhibitors. We detail the molecular architecture of the ATP-binding pocket of DYRK1A, key regulatory residues (Lys188, Phe238, Glu239, Leu241), and structure-function relationships governing inhibitor classes: ATP-competitive agents, ATP-non-competitive inhibitors, and Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras (PROTAC) degraders with emphasis on functional group modifications and scaffold optimization strategies. Readers will gain actionable insights on binding mode predictions, potency-selectivity trade-offs, and prioritization of lead compounds for preclinical validation. The framework addresses pharmacokinetic property optimization and selectivity profiling across kinase families, enabling researchers to accelerate rational inhibitor design and facilitate translation of DYRK1A therapeutics into clinical trials for neurodegenerative and developmental disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.